PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TXT vs. K
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TXTK
YTD Return8.95%48.76%
1Y Return17.04%61.70%
3Y Return (Ann)4.76%17.82%
5Y Return (Ann)13.62%11.37%
10Y Return (Ann)7.86%5.57%
Sharpe Ratio0.652.39
Sortino Ratio1.004.94
Omega Ratio1.141.61
Calmar Ratio0.891.40
Martin Ratio1.9616.35
Ulcer Index7.73%3.78%
Daily Std Dev23.29%25.84%
Max Drawdown-94.72%-82.53%
Current Drawdown-9.67%-8.87%

Fundamentals


TXTK
Market Cap$16.24B$27.92B
EPS$4.55$3.01
PE Ratio19.2426.91
PEG Ratio0.831.64
Total Revenue (TTM)$13.98B$12.80B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.24B$4.48B
EBITDA (TTM)-$1.31B$2.11B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between TXT and K is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

TXT vs. K - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TXT achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than K's 48.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TXT has outperformed K with an annualized return of 7.86%, while K has yielded a comparatively lower 5.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.07%
33.11%
TXT
K

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TXT vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Textron Inc. (TXT) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TXT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TXT, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TXT, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TXT, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TXT, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TXT, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.96
K
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for K, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for K, currently valued at 4.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for K, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.61
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for K, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for K, currently valued at 16.35, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.35

TXT vs. K - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the K Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXT and K, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.65
2.39
TXT
K

Dividends

TXT vs. K - Dividend Comparison

TXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than K's 2.78% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TXT
Textron Inc.
0.09%0.10%0.11%0.10%0.17%0.18%0.17%0.14%0.16%0.19%0.19%0.22%
K
Kellogg Company
2.78%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TXT vs. K - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXT drawdown since its inception was -94.72%, which is greater than K's maximum drawdown of -82.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXT and K. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.67%
-8.87%
TXT
K

Volatility

TXT vs. K - Volatility Comparison

Textron Inc. (TXT) has a higher volatility of 10.38% compared to Kellogg Company (K) at 1.04%. This indicates that TXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than K based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.38%
1.04%
TXT
K

Financials

TXT vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Textron Inc. and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items