PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXT vs. HWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TXT vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Textron Inc. (TXT) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXT achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 36.89% return. Over the past 10 years, TXT has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 9.43%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 33.65% annualized return.


TXT

1D
-2.83%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
-4.29%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
9.43%

HWM

1D
0.97%
1M
9.28%
YTD
36.89%
6M
34.81%
1Y
62.11%
3Y*
82.73%
5Y*
53.11%
10Y*
33.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXT vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TXT
Textron Inc.
-0.22%14.08%-4.80%13.71%-7.87%59.93%8.60%-2.86%-18.62%16.72%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
36.89%87.95%102.71%37.84%24.16%11.67%21.03%83.54%-37.43%48.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TXT and HWM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 1984

0.42

The correlation between TXT and HWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TXT:

$15.32B

HWM:

$112.99B

EPS

TXT:

$5.23

HWM:

$4.31

PE Ratio

TXT:

16.61

HWM:

65.07

PEG Ratio

TXT:

1.41

HWM:

1.10

PS Ratio

TXT:

1.02

HWM:

13.16

PB Ratio

TXT:

1.91

HWM:

20.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

TXT:

$15.19B

HWM:

$8.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TXT:

$2.19B

HWM:

$2.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

TXT:

$1.61B

HWM:

$2.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXT vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXT
TXT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXT vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Textron Inc. (TXT) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TXTHWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.32

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

3.93

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

11.10

-9.28

TXT vs. HWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXT and HWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TXT vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXT drawdown since its inception was -94.72%, which is greater than HWM's maximum drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXT and HWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXTHWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.72%

-88.30%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.69%

-15.89%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.33%

-19.41%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.33%

-21.22%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.96%

-64.81%

-5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.69%

-1.01%

-12.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.95%

-31.00%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

5.61%

+1.56%

Volatility

TXT vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Textron Inc. (TXT) is 7.51%, while Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that TXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXTHWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

10.24%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.53%

25.16%

-4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.87%

31.74%

-5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.49%

32.21%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.01%

39.83%

-6.82%

Dividends

TXT vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

TXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than HWM's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.17%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%
TXT
Textron Inc.
0.09%0.09%0.10%0.10%0.47%0.10%0.17%0.18%0.17%0.14%0.16%0.19%

Financials

TXT vs. HWM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Textron Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B20222023202420252026
3.70B
2.31B
(TXT) Total Revenue
(HWM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TXT vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Textron Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
8.7%
36.9%
Portfolio components
TXT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported a gross profit of 320.00M and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.7%.

HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

TXT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported an operating income of 226.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

TXT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Textron Inc. reported a net income of 220.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TXT and HWM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWM has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to TXT (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXT dropped -94.72% vs HWM's -88.30%.

HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXT and HWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer