DCO vs. RDFN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DCO (Ducommun Incorporated) and RDFN (Redfin Corporation) are both stocks. DCO operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while RDFN operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate). At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DCO vs. RDFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DCO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 9.33%
• YTD: 57.72%
• 6M: 66.60%
• 1Y: 103.39%
• 3Y*: 48.55%
• 5Y*: 22.05%
• 10Y*: 22.92%

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCO vs. RDFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DCO Ducommun Incorporated	57.72%	49.43%	22.28%	4.20%	6.82%	-12.91%	6.27%	39.12%	27.66%	-4.59%
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-44.06%	224.65%	46.81%	-54.02%	44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DCO and RDFN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2017	0.26

The correlation between DCO and RDFN shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) DCO : $839.64M RDFN : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) DCO : $226.25M RDFN : $364.02M
EBITDA (TTM) DCO : $11.47M RDFN : -$129.82M

Return for Risk

DCO vs. RDFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCO

DCO Risk / Return Rank: 94
DCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DCO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DCO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCO vs. RDFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DCO	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.63	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DCO	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DCO	RDFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.18%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DCO	RDFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.06%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.47%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.67%	—	—

Dividends

DCO vs. RDFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither DCO nor RDFN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DCO and RDFN in my portfolio?

DCO and RDFN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.