PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCMT vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DCMT vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DCMT vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCMT achieves a 27.72% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 30.72% return.


DCMT

1D
-1.56%
1M
15.33%
YTD
27.72%
6M
27.84%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PDBC

1D
-1.03%
1M
16.09%
YTD
30.72%
6M
33.97%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DCMT vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DCMT vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCMT vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCMTPDBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

1.72

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.31

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.04

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.42

7.48

+0.94

DCMT vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCMT and PDBC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCMTPDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.72

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.22

+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between DCMT and PDBC is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DCMT vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than PDBC's 2.94% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
2.88%3.67%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.94%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%

Drawdowns

DCMT vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCMT drawdown since its inception was -11.95%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMT and PDBC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DCMTPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.95%

-49.52%

+37.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-11.07%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.03%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-23.53%

+20.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

4.50%

-0.96%

Volatility

DCMT vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 8.15%. This indicates that DCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DCMTPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

8.15%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

13.88%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

18.72%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

18.92%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

17.69%

-2.86%