DCMT vs. CMDT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT).

DCMT and CMDT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DCMT is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024. CMDT is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on May 9, 2023.

Performance

DCMT vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DCMT vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	27.72%	6.04%	4.96%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	16.96%	12.78%	6.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCMT achieves a 27.72% return, which is significantly higher than CMDT's 16.96% return.

DCMT

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 15.33%
• YTD: 27.72%
• 6M: 27.84%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMDT

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 8.58%
• YTD: 16.96%
• 6M: 19.62%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCMT vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCMT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

DCMT

DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF

CMDT

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

Return for Risk

DCMT vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 81
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 87
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCMT vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DCMT	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.85	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.50	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.34	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.72	-0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	10.00	-1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DCMT vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCMT and CMDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DCMT	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.85	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	1.22	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between DCMT and CMDT is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DCMT vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

DCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than CMDT's 2.60% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.88%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.60%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%

Drawdowns

DCMT vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCMT drawdown since its inception was -11.95%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMT and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCMT	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.95%	-9.69%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-9.21%	-1.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-0.74%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-2.79%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	2.51%	+1.03%

Volatility

DCMT vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) at 5.26%. This indicates that DCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCMT	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.79%	5.26%	+3.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.24%	9.59%	+3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.57%	13.23%	+4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	12.13%	+2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.83%	12.13%	+2.70%