PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DCMSX vs. FYHTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

DCMSX vs. FYHTX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX).

DCMSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 8, 2010. FYHTX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. It was launched on May 30, 2017.

Performance

DCMSX vs. FYHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DCMSX vs. FYHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCMSX
DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio		25.97%15.15%5.90%-9.14%11.36%33.54%-1.78%7.96%-11.22%6.62%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund		16.29%14.72%4.73%-8.62%15.32%26.43%-3.84%6.91%-11.71%6.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCMSX achieves a 25.97% return, which is significantly higher than FYHTX's 16.29% return.

DCMSX

1D
0.47%
1M
9.69%
YTD
25.97%
6M
32.29%
1Y
33.46%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
8.45%

FYHTX

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.22%
YTD
16.29%
6M
22.41%
1Y
22.79%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio

Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund

Often compared with DCMSX:
DCMSX vs. PCRIXDCMSX vs. VCMDXDCMSX vs. CCRSXDCMSX vs. DBCDCMSX vs. VOODCMSX vs. GLDDCMSX vs. SDCI
Often compared with FYHTX:
FYHTX vs. CMDYFYHTX vs. PCLPXFYHTX vs. BCSKXFYHTX vs. GCCIXFYHTX vs. VOOFYHTX vs. FFGCXFYHTX vs. HGER

DCMSX vs. FYHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCMSX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than FYHTX's 0.63% expense ratio.

FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
DCMSX
DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio

Return for Risk

DCMSX vs. FYHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DCMSX
DCMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DCMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
FYHTX
FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCMSX vs. FYHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DCMSXFYHTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

1.56

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

2.07

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.29

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

2.66

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.61

7.40

+3.21

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DCMSX vs. FYHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FYHTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCMSX and FYHTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DCMSXFYHTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.56

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.75

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.47

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between DCMSX and FYHTX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DCMSX vs. FYHTX - Dividend Comparison

DCMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than FYHTX's 2.52% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCMSX
DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio		8.36%10.75%2.83%2.52%7.46%49.44%0.37%1.51%1.63%3.09%0.47%0.15%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund		2.52%2.93%3.78%4.10%57.34%15.05%0.00%7.00%12.49%0.36%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DCMSX vs. FYHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCMSX drawdown since its inception was -60.94%, which is greater than FYHTX's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMSX and FYHTX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

DCMSXFYHTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.94%

-33.22%

-27.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-9.18%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.93%

-25.47%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.52%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.96%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.13%

-12.15%

-19.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.30%

-0.02%

Volatility

DCMSX vs. FYHTX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) at 5.38%. This indicates that DCMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYHTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

DCMSXFYHTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

5.38%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

11.45%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

15.30%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

15.87%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.44%

14.52%

-0.08%