DCEMX vs. DAFGX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DCEMX (Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund) and DAFGX (Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - DCEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Dunham, while DAFGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Dunham. Over the past 10 years, DCEMX returned 7.23%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for DAFGX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DCEMX charges 2.03%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for DAFGX.

Performance

DCEMX vs. DAFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCEMX achieves a 25.63% return, which is significantly higher than DAFGX's 4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, DCEMX has underperformed DAFGX with an annualized return of 7.23%, while DAFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.

DCEMX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -1.86%
• 6M: 18.83%
• YTD: 25.63%
• 1Y: 44.59%
• 3Y*: 19.68%
• 5Y*: 4.66%
• 10Y*: 7.23%

DAFGX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 5.57%
• 6M: 3.19%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 1Y: 0.11%
• 3Y*: 9.13%
• 5Y*: 2.29%
• 10Y*: 13.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCEMX vs. DAFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DCEMX Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund	25.63%	28.90%	4.84%	6.16%	-25.20%	-7.30%	23.89%	21.88%	-20.99%	32.42%
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund	4.06%	1.72%	11.42%	54.81%	-38.96%	13.01%	49.42%	35.17%	9.80%	26.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DCEMX and DAFGX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2011	0.60

The correlation between DCEMX and DAFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DCEMX vs. DAFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCEMX

DCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 67
DCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
DCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

DAFGX

DAFGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
DAFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
DAFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DAFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
DAFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DAFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCEMX vs. DAFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DCEMX	DAFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	-0.04	+1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	0.08	+2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.01	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	-0.03	+3.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.59	-0.07	+10.66

DCEMX vs. DAFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the DAFGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCEMX and DAFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DCEMX vs. DAFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCEMX drawdown since its inception was -70.65%, which is greater than DAFGX's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCEMX and DAFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DCEMX	DAFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.65%	-47.69%	-22.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-27.70%	+13.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.83%	-34.81%	+17.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.23%	-47.69%	+8.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.88%	-47.69%	+1.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.56%	-12.31%	+4.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.04%	-9.59%	-16.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	12.36%	-8.20%

Volatility

DCEMX vs. DAFGX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) at 7.48%. This indicates that DCEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DCEMX	DAFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.91%	7.48%	+4.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.61%	16.60%	+6.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.90%	20.38%	+4.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.15%	26.39%	-7.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.65%	25.46%	-6.81%

DCEMX vs. DAFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCEMX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DAFGX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

DCEMX vs. DAFGX - Dividend Comparison

DCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than DAFGX's 15.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund	15.87%	16.51%	0.00%	2.40%	0.00%	8.61%	2.31%	3.33%	8.90%	0.95%	0.00%	0.58%
DCEMX Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund	1.72%	2.17%	0.00%	0.12%	0.00%	9.47%	0.00%	0.26%	1.00%	0.38%	1.27%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DCEMX and DAFGX in my portfolio?

DCEMX and DAFGX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DCEMX or DAFGX?

DCEMX has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to DAFGX (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCEMX dropped -70.65% vs DAFGX's -47.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.