PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCEMX vs. DCDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCEMX vs. DCDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCEMX achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly higher than DCDGX's 14.02% return. Over the past 10 years, DCEMX has underperformed DCDGX with an annualized return of 6.03%, while DCDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.


DCEMX

1D
4.68%
1M
-8.02%
6M
5.11%
YTD
14.96%
1Y
32.80%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
6.03%
ALL TIME*
3.90%

DCDGX

1D
2.98%
1M
-5.79%
6M
8.18%
YTD
14.02%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
11.93%
ALL TIME*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DCEMX vs. DCDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
14.96%28.90%4.84%6.16%-25.20%-7.30%23.89%21.88%-20.99%32.42%
DCDGX
Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund
14.02%11.14%13.01%20.48%-33.69%4.19%67.17%23.96%-4.54%28.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DCEMX and DCDGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2004

0.63

The correlation between DCEMX and DCDGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (10 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCEMX vs. DCDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DCEMX
DCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DCDGX
DCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DCEMX vs. DCDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCEMXDCDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.85

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

6.67

-0.70

DCEMX vs. DCDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the DCDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCEMX and DCDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCEMX vs. DCDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCEMX drawdown since its inception was -70.65%, which is greater than DCDGX's maximum drawdown of -56.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCEMX and DCDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCEMXDCDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.65%

-56.02%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.19%

-13.42%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-27.95%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.89%

-48.05%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.88%

-48.05%

+2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.41%

-8.89%

-6.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.01%

-14.84%

-11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

3.75%

+1.49%

Volatility

DCEMX vs. DCDGX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX) at 7.05%. This indicates that DCEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCEMXDCDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.90%

7.05%

+3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.24%

18.73%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.59%

23.65%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

25.95%

-6.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

24.89%

-6.02%

DCEMX vs. DCDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCEMX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DCDGX's 2.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCEMX vs. DCDGX - Dividend Comparison

DCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than DCDGX's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCDGX
Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund
5.91%6.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%29.30%22.33%2.06%38.51%20.51%0.00%11.22%
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
1.88%2.17%0.00%0.12%0.00%9.47%0.00%0.26%1.00%0.38%1.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCEMX and DCDGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCEMX has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to DCDGX (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCEMX dropped -70.65% vs DCDGX's -56.02%.

DCEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCEMX and DCDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer