PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCDGX vs. DAFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCDGX vs. DAFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX) and Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCDGX achieves a 20.23% return, which is significantly higher than DAFGX's 3.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DCDGX having a 13.17% annualized return and DAFGX not far behind at 13.12%.


DCDGX

1D
1.63%
1M
6.65%
YTD
20.23%
6M
19.55%
1Y
38.63%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
13.17%

DAFGX

1D
-1.33%
1M
9.75%
YTD
3.88%
6M
1.32%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCDGX vs. DAFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCDGX
Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund
20.23%11.14%13.01%20.48%-33.69%4.19%67.17%23.96%-4.54%28.81%
DAFGX
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund
3.88%1.72%11.42%54.81%-38.96%13.01%49.42%35.17%9.80%26.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DCDGX and DAFGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2011

0.82

The correlation between DCDGX and DAFGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCDGX vs. DAFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCDGX
DCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DAFGX
DAFGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DAFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DAFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCDGX vs. DAFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX) and Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCDGXDAFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.05

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

0.15

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

0.35

+12.07

DCDGX vs. DAFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCDGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the DAFGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCDGX and DAFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCDGXDAFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

0.22

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.18

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.52

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.53

-0.20

Drawdowns

DCDGX vs. DAFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCDGX drawdown since its inception was -56.02%, which is greater than DAFGX's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCDGX and DAFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCDGXDAFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.02%

-47.69%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-27.70%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

-34.81%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.05%

-47.69%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.05%

-47.69%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.46%

+12.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.93%

-9.55%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

11.90%

-8.59%

Volatility

DCDGX vs. DAFGX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) at 4.92%. This indicates that DCDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCDGXDAFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

4.92%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.66%

14.70%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

18.99%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.67%

26.17%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.78%

25.40%

-0.62%

DCDGX vs. DAFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCDGX has a 2.83% expense ratio, which is higher than DAFGX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCDGX vs. DAFGX - Dividend Comparison

DCDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than DAFGX's 15.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAFGX
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund
15.89%16.51%0.00%2.40%0.00%8.61%2.31%3.33%8.90%0.95%0.00%0.58%
DCDGX
Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund
5.61%6.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%29.30%22.33%2.06%38.51%20.51%0.00%11.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCDGX and DAFGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCDGX has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to DAFGX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCDGX dropped -56.02% vs DAFGX's -47.69%.

DCDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCDGX and DAFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer