DCCIX vs. SSCDX
DCCIX (Delaware Small Cap Core Fund) and SSCDX (Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DCCIX returned 11.20%/yr vs 11.52%/yr for SSCDX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DCCIX charges 0.81%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SSCDX.
Performance
DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCCIX achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly lower than SSCDX's 21.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DCCIX having a 11.20% annualized return and SSCDX not far ahead at 11.52%.
DCCIX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 16.80%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
SSCDX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 21.28%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 36.47%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCCIX Delaware Small Cap Core Fund | 18.71% | 4.59% | 10.27% | 14.65% | -15.94% | 23.23% | 14.81% | 26.04% | -11.82% | 14.06% |
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 21.28% | 12.90% | 15.50% | 15.50% | -17.15% | 23.46% | 16.21% | 27.12% | -17.10% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCCIX and SSCDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2015 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DCCIX and SSCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCCIX vs. SSCDX — Risk / Return Rank
DCCIX
SSCDX
DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Small Cap Core Fund (DCCIX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DCCIX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 4.60 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 15.90 | -5.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCCIX drawdown since its inception was -59.44%, which is greater than SSCDX's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCCIX and SSCDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCCIX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.44% | -38.79% | -20.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.35% | -8.22% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.47% | -23.99% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.71% | -27.06% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.44% | -38.79% | -0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -6.98% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.38% | +0.65% |
Volatility
DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Volatility Comparison
Delaware Small Cap Core Fund (DCCIX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) have volatilities of 5.04% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCCIX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.96% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | 12.28% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 16.57% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 20.12% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 20.73% | +1.47% |
DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCCIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCDX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Dividend Comparison
DCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than SSCDX's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCCIX Delaware Small Cap Core Fund | 3.71% | 4.40% | 1.18% | 4.17% | 3.82% | 6.35% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 10.74% | 7.97% | 1.11% | 3.11% |
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 1.77% | 2.21% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 4.26% | 8.47% | 0.77% | 1.33% | 2.69% | 0.85% | 1.16% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DCCIX and SSCDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DCCIX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SSCDX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCCIX dropped -59.44% vs SSCDX's -38.79%.
SSCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCCIX and SSCDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer