PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCCIX vs. SSCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Small Cap Core Fund (DCCIX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCCIX achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly lower than SSCDX's 21.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DCCIX having a 11.20% annualized return and SSCDX not far ahead at 11.52%.


DCCIX

1D
1.09%
1M
5.89%
YTD
18.71%
6M
16.80%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
11.20%

SSCDX

1D
0.93%
1M
4.08%
YTD
21.28%
6M
18.74%
1Y
36.47%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCCIX
Delaware Small Cap Core Fund
18.71%4.59%10.27%14.65%-15.94%23.23%14.81%26.04%-11.82%14.06%
SSCDX
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund
21.28%12.90%15.50%15.50%-17.15%23.46%16.21%27.12%-17.10%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DCCIX and SSCDX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2015

0.94

The correlation between DCCIX and SSCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCCIX vs. SSCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCCIX
DCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCDX
SSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Small Cap Core Fund (DCCIX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCCIXSSCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.60

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.75

15.90

-5.14

DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the SSCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCCIX and SSCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCCIX drawdown since its inception was -59.44%, which is greater than SSCDX's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCCIX and SSCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCCIXSSCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.44%

-38.79%

-20.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-8.22%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.47%

-23.99%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.71%

-27.06%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.44%

-38.79%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-6.98%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.38%

+0.65%

Volatility

DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Small Cap Core Fund (DCCIX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) have volatilities of 5.04% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCCIXSSCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.96%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

12.28%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

16.57%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

20.12%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

20.73%

+1.47%

DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCCIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCDX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCCIX vs. SSCDX - Dividend Comparison

DCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than SSCDX's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCCIX
Delaware Small Cap Core Fund
3.71%4.40%1.18%4.17%3.82%6.35%0.40%2.03%10.74%7.97%1.11%3.11%
SSCDX
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund
1.77%2.21%1.79%1.07%4.26%8.47%0.77%1.33%2.69%0.85%1.16%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DCCIX and SSCDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DCCIX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SSCDX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCCIX dropped -59.44% vs SSCDX's -38.79%.

SSCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCCIX and SSCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer