PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DBXS.DE

1D
0.65%
1M
3.73%
6M
9.03%
YTD
10.18%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
9.47%

H4ZZ.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXS.DE
DBXS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DBXS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZZ.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBXS.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXS.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.29%, which is greater than H4ZZ.DE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXS.DE and H4ZZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXS.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.29%

0.00%

-48.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

0.00%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

0.00%

-8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

Volatility

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXS.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.99%

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZZ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBXS.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

DBXS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while H4ZZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXS.DE
Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.38%1.52%1.63%1.76%3.25%1.20%1.59%1.21%2.35%1.32%1.06%1.25%
H4ZZ.DE
HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, H4ZZ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXS.DE.

DBXS.DE tracks Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index, while H4ZZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DBXS.DE and 0.05% for H4ZZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXS.DE and H4ZZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer