DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE
DBXQ.DE (Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF) and XESC.DE (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBXQ.DE is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 3-5, while XESC.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXQ.DE returned 0.26%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for XESC.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBXQ.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XESC.DE.
Performance
DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXQ.DE achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than XESC.DE's 9.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXQ.DE has underperformed XESC.DE with an annualized return of 0.26%, while XESC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.
DBXQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 1.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.10%
- 10Y*
- 0.26%
XESC.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXQ.DE Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF | 0.60% | 2.57% | 2.23% | 5.50% | -10.12% | -1.37% | 1.56% | 2.56% | -0.06% | -0.19% |
XESC.DE Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.31% | 22.24% | 11.06% | 22.50% | -8.87% | 23.54% | -2.88% | 30.09% | -12.09% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXQ.DE and XESC.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2008 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, DBXQ.DE and XESC.DE have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXQ.DE
XESC.DE
DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBXQ.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.96 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 6.81 | -5.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.25%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -46.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXQ.DE and XESC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXQ.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -46.74% | +34.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -10.88% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.41% | -16.53% | +14.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.13% | -23.33% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.25% | -38.51% | +26.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -1.71% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -9.06% | +7.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 3.13% | -2.23% |
Volatility
DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) is 0.63%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that DBXQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXQ.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 3.52% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 13.23% | -10.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 16.03% | -13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 17.56% | -13.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 17.98% | -14.67% |
DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXQ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DBXQ.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBXQ.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXQ.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for DBXQ.DE.
DBXQ.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. DBXQ.DE tracks Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 3-5, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for DBXQ.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXQ.DE and XESC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer