DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE
DBXI.DE (Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - DBXI.DE tracks the FTSE MIB while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXI.DE returned 14.91%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBXI.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXI.DE achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXI.DE has outperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 14.91%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.75% annualized return.
DBXI.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 29.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF | 14.49% | 37.50% | 18.27% | 33.40% | -9.08% | 26.51% | -4.28% | 33.02% | -14.48% | 16.46% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXI.DE and AMED.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DBXI.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXI.DE
AMED.DE
DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBXI.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.49 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 9.40 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBXI.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.74 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.65 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.57 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.47 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.49%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXI.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXI.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.49% | -38.35% | -31.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.62% | -10.56% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.56% | -14.07% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -24.06% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.46% | -38.35% | -2.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.17% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.56% | -6.69% | -22.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.81% | -0.14% |
Volatility
DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) is 4.63%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that DBXI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXI.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 5.61% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 12.64% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 15.19% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 15.87% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 17.00% | +3.37% |
DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBXI.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBXI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF | 3.63% | 3.93% | 4.53% | 3.78% | 7.45% | 0.94% | 4.23% | 3.33% | 2.66% | 1.94% | 2.51% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXI.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXI.DE.
DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DBXI.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXI.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer