DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE
DBXG.DE (Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 25+ UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XESC.DE (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBXG.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx EUR Eurozone 25+ Index, while XESC.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXG.DE returned -3.94%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for XESC.DE. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. DBXG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XESC.DE.
Performance
DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXG.DE achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than XESC.DE's 11.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXG.DE has underperformed XESC.DE with an annualized return of -3.94%, while XESC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.
DBXG.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- -3.17%
- 3Y*
- -1.97%
- 5Y*
- -10.45%
- 10Y*
- -3.94%
XESC.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXG.DE Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 25+ UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.36% | -9.41% | -3.96% | 9.47% | -40.42% | -9.69% | 16.29% | 21.12% | 4.90% | -2.36% |
XESC.DE Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 11.96% | 22.24% | 11.06% | 22.50% | -8.87% | 23.54% | -2.88% | 30.09% | -12.09% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXG.DE and XESC.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2008 | -0.06 |
The correlation between DBXG.DE and XESC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXG.DE
XESC.DE
DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 25+ UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBXG.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBXG.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.25 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.04 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 7.10 | -7.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.51%, which is greater than XESC.DE's maximum drawdown of -46.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXG.DE and XESC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXG.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.51% | -46.74% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.77% | -10.88% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -16.53% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.05% | -23.33% | -27.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.51% | -38.51% | -15.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.73% | 0.00% | -48.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -9.05% | -7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.13% | +0.29% |
Volatility
DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 25+ UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBXG.DE) is 2.60%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that DBXG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXG.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.86% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 13.34% | -5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.03% | 16.07% | -5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 17.58% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 17.93% | -2.76% |
DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DBXG.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBXG.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXG.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for DBXG.DE.
DBXG.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. DBXG.DE tracks iBoxx EUR Eurozone 25+ Index, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for DBXG.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXG.DE and XESC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer