PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXD.DE vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXD.DE vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DBXD.DE is traded in EUR, while VTI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VTI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXD.DE achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXD.DE has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 8.92%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.54% annualized return.


DBXD.DE

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.35%
6M
3.40%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
8.92%

VTI

1D
-1.90%
1M
2.40%
YTD
10.86%
6M
9.43%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXD.DE vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
1.35%22.65%18.18%19.60%-12.74%15.26%3.11%24.69%-18.52%12.12%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.86%3.20%31.98%22.27%-14.54%35.08%11.10%33.62%-0.79%6.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXD.DE and VTI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.47

The correlation between DBXD.DE and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXD.DE vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXD.DE
DBXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXD.DE vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBXD.DEVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.37

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

3.40

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.58

12.71

-12.14

DBXD.DE vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXD.DE and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBXD.DEVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.01

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.78

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.78

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.61

-0.30

Drawdowns

DBXD.DE vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.98%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXD.DE and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXD.DEVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.98%

-50.14%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-7.45%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.92%

-24.34%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-24.34%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.83%

-34.51%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-2.01%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-7.70%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

1.99%

+1.98%

Volatility

DBXD.DE vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.04%. This indicates that DBXD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXD.DEVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

3.04%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

8.95%

+4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

12.61%

+3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

17.23%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

18.76%

-0.41%

DBXD.DE vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXD.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXD.DE vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

DBXD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXD.DE and VTI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for DBXD.DE.

DBXD.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. DBXD.DE tracks DAX®, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DBXD.DE and 0.03% for VTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXD.DE and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer