DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE
DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - DBXD.DE tracks the DAX® while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXD.DE returned 8.92%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBXD.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXD.DE achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXD.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 8.92%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 1.35% | 22.65% | 18.18% | 19.60% | -12.74% | 15.26% | 3.11% | 24.69% | -18.52% | 12.12% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXD.DE and AMED.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DBXD.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXD.DE
AMED.DE
DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBXD.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.33 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.49 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 9.40 | -8.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBXD.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 1.74 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.65 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.57 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.47 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.98%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXD.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXD.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.98% | -38.35% | -16.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -10.56% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.92% | -14.07% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -24.06% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | -38.35% | -0.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -0.17% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.34% | -6.69% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 2.81% | +1.16% |
Volatility
DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) is 5.10%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that DBXD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXD.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 5.61% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 12.64% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 15.19% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 15.87% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 17.00% | +1.35% |
DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXD.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DBXD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBXD.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXD.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
DBXD.DE tracks DAX®, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DBXD.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXD.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer