DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DBX8.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) and ESGP.DE (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - DBX8.DE tracks the MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom while ESGP.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBX8.DE returned 45.04%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for ESGP.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX8.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.

Performance

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBX8.DE achieves a 109.21% return, which is significantly higher than ESGP.DE's 6.87% return.

DBX8.DE

• 1D: -5.08%
• 1M: 16.35%
• YTD: 109.21%
• 6M: 127.53%
• 1Y: 227.59%
• 3Y*: 45.04%
• 5Y*: 19.70%
• 10Y*: 16.74%

ESGP.DE

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 6.87%
• 6M: 8.16%
• 1Y: 11.61%
• 3Y*: 9.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DBX8.DE Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C	109.21%	77.39%	-18.45%	15.93%	-23.95%	-2.11%
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF	6.87%	5.79%	12.94%	2.10%	-2.36%	2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DBX8.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021	0.53

The correlation between DBX8.DE and ESGP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBX8.DE

DBX8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 96
DBX8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DBX8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DBX8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DBX8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DBX8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ESGP.DE

ESGP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 32
ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ESGP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ESGP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ESGP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ESGP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBX8.DE	ESGP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.17	1.02	+4.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.03	1.56	+3.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.18	+0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.67	1.83	+8.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.63	5.36	+27.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBX8.DE Sharpe Ratio is 5.17, which is higher than the ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBX8.DE and ESGP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBX8.DE	ESGP.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.17	1.02	+4.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.39	-0.08

Drawdowns

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBX8.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX8.DE and ESGP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBX8.DE	ESGP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.01%	-20.50%	-47.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.19%	-6.31%	-14.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.70%	-20.50%	-10.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.82%	-2.57%	-3.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.55%	-5.31%	-12.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.94%	2.16%	+4.78%

Volatility

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.08% compared to HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that DBX8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBX8.DE	ESGP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.08%	3.24%	+13.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.48%	8.68%	+24.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.73%	11.29%	+32.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.53%	14.54%	+12.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.03%	14.54%	+11.49%

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBX8.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBX8.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBX8.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBX8.DE and ESGP.DE in my portfolio?

DBX8.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DBX8.DE or ESGP.DE?

On fees, DBX8.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBX8.DE or ESGP.DE?

DBX8.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.

What is the main difference between DBX8.DE and ESGP.DE?

DBX8.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom, while ESGP.DE tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBX8.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.