DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE
DBX8.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) and CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - DBX8.DE tracks the MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom while CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX8.DE returned 16.74%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for CEBL.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX8.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CEBL.DE.
Performance
DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX8.DE achieves a 109.21% return, which is significantly higher than CEBL.DE's 31.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX8.DE has outperformed CEBL.DE with an annualized return of 16.74%, while CEBL.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.02% annualized return.
DBX8.DE
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- 16.35%
- YTD
- 109.21%
- 6M
- 127.53%
- 1Y
- 227.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.74%
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX8.DE Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 109.21% | 77.39% | -18.45% | 15.93% | -23.95% | -0.54% | 30.13% | 14.92% | -18.04% | 28.39% |
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX8.DE and CEBL.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DBX8.DE and CEBL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX8.DE
CEBL.DE
DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX8.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.50 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.67 | 4.83 | +5.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.63 | 17.67 | +14.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX8.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.17 | 2.81 | +2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.48 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.58 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX8.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than CEBL.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX8.DE and CEBL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX8.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.01% | -35.09% | -32.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -11.43% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.70% | -20.53% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.29% | -29.00% | -12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.89% | -33.12% | -8.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -2.85% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.55% | -11.09% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.94% | 3.13% | +3.81% |
Volatility
DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.08% compared to iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) at 8.24%. This indicates that DBX8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEBL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX8.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.08% | 8.24% | +8.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.48% | 16.36% | +17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.73% | 19.68% | +24.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.53% | 18.48% | +9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 18.94% | +7.09% |
DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX8.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CEBL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX8.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX8.DE nor CEBL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX8.DE and CEBL.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBX8.DE.
DBX8.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom, while CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBX8.DE and 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX8.DE and CEBL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer