DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE
DBX7.DE (Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and EXUS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD) are both exchange-traded funds - DBX7.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Nifty 50, while EXUS.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DBX7.DE returned -16.62% vs 20.10% for EXUS.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBX7.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EXUS.DE.
Performance
DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX7.DE achieves a -14.67% return, which is significantly lower than EXUS.DE's 9.64% return.
DBX7.DE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -14.67%
- 6M
- -15.66%
- 1Y
- -16.62%
- 3Y*
- -0.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
EXUS.DE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 11.67%
- 1Y
- 20.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DBX7.DE Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -14.67% | -7.11% | 7.54% |
EXUS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | 9.64% | 17.80% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX7.DE and EXUS.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX7.DE
EXUS.DE
DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX7.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.31 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 2.30 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | 9.01 | -10.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX7.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 1.62 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.10 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX7.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, which is greater than EXUS.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX7.DE and EXUS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX7.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -16.21% | -48.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.90% | -8.68% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.53% | -0.76% | -24.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -1.78% | -14.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.42% | 2.23% | +7.19% |
Volatility
DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE) at 3.28%. This indicates that DBX7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX7.DE | EXUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 3.28% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 10.06% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 12.37% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 13.39% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 13.39% | +6.96% |
DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX7.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EXUS.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX7.DE vs. EXUS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX7.DE nor EXUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX7.DE and EXUS.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EXUS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EXUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBX7.DE.
DBX7.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EXUS.DE is Global Equities. DBX7.DE tracks Nifty 50, while EXUS.DE tracks MSCI World ex USA index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBX7.DE and 0.15% for EXUS.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX7.DE and EXUS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer