DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE
DBX5.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C) and LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - DBX5.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom while LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBX5.DE returned 22.99%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for LCUA.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX5.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LCUA.DE.
Performance
DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX5.DE achieves a 69.45% return, which is significantly higher than LCUA.DE's 31.85% return.
DBX5.DE
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 14.40%
- YTD
- 69.45%
- 6M
- 74.72%
- 1Y
- 112.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.65%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 22.04%
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 6M
- 33.69%
- 1Y
- 54.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX5.DE Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C | 69.45% | 18.33% | 31.08% | 24.15% | -25.19% | 37.79% | 24.51% | 39.18% | -8.16% |
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 31.85% | 18.08% | 18.51% | 3.26% | -14.89% | 1.98% | 15.44% | 22.39% | -10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX5.DE and LCUA.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DBX5.DE and LCUA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX5.DE
LCUA.DE
DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX5.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.49 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.09 | 4.49 | +7.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.84 | 16.33 | +19.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX5.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 2.72 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.48 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.48 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX5.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than LCUA.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX5.DE and LCUA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX5.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -33.18% | -22.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -12.13% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.81% | -21.07% | -9.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.62% | -28.54% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -2.86% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -12.02% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.34% | -0.22% |
Volatility
DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.28% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) at 8.54%. This indicates that DBX5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX5.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.28% | 8.54% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 17.04% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.18% | 20.08% | +4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 18.48% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 19.46% | +1.09% |
DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX5.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX5.DE nor LCUA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX5.DE and LCUA.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DBX5.DE.
DBX5.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom, while LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DBX5.DE and 0.12% for LCUA.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX5.DE and LCUA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer