DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX3.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE).
DBX3.DE and AMEL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBX3.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Low Carbon SRI Leaders. It was launched on Jun 22, 2007. AMEL.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. Both DBX3.DE and AMEL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX3.DE Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 16.87% | 40.51% | -24.96% | 22.19% | 12.46% | -15.09% | -21.52% | 21.36% | -3.41% | 7.06% |
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 18.02% | 38.06% | -22.22% | 28.09% | 16.34% | -3.21% | -21.29% | 20.69% | -3.27% | 8.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX3.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than AMEL.DE's 18.02% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX3.DE has underperformed AMEL.DE with an annualized return of 5.37%, while AMEL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.03% annualized return.
DBX3.DE
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 26.28%
- 1Y
- 47.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 18.02%
- 6M
- 28.91%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX3.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX3.DE
AMEL.DE
DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX3.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX3.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | 2.33 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 2.94 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 3.92 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.88 | 14.90 | -1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX3.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.33 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.64 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.31 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.14 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX3.DE and AMEL.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX3.DE nor AMEL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX3.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.04%, which is greater than AMEL.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX3.DE and AMEL.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX3.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.04% | -52.69% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -12.49% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.43% | -25.38% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.11% | -51.31% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -2.24% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -18.04% | -7.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 3.25% | +0.18% |
Volatility
DBX3.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX3.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) at 7.85%. This indicates that DBX3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBX3.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | 7.85% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.57% | 14.83% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 20.20% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 20.82% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 25.40% | +0.32% |