PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBSDY vs. ATH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR (DBSDY) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DBSDY is traded in USD, while ATH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBSDY achieves a 18.81% return, which is significantly lower than ATH.TO's 39.89% return. Over the past 10 years, DBSDY has outperformed ATH.TO with an annualized return of 23.18%, while ATH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.58% annualized return.


DBSDY

1D
0.74%
1M
4.02%
YTD
18.81%
6M
19.14%
1Y
52.08%
3Y*
41.40%
5Y*
26.90%
10Y*
23.18%

ATH.TO

1D
0.17%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
39.89%
6M
40.02%
1Y
74.64%
3Y*
49.11%
5Y*
55.47%
10Y*
20.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBSDY
DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR
18.81%44.73%47.43%7.13%8.63%32.34%1.70%18.17%-0.93%63.53%
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
39.89%38.20%17.84%77.25%90.45%600.35%-70.49%-37.84%-14.65%-44.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DBSDY and ATH.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.21

The correlation between DBSDY and ATH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DBSDY:

$144.74B

ATH.TO:

CA$4.95B

EPS

DBSDY:

SGD 14.77

ATH.TO:

CA$0.45

PE Ratio

DBSDY:

17.87

ATH.TO:

22.82

PEG Ratio

DBSDY:

1.38

ATH.TO:

0.87

PS Ratio

DBSDY:

5.17

ATH.TO:

3.71

PB Ratio

DBSDY:

2.72

ATH.TO:

2.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

DBSDY:

SGD 36.24B

ATH.TO:

CA$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DBSDY:

SGD 36.24B

ATH.TO:

CA$518.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

DBSDY:

SGD 9.54B

ATH.TO:

CA$505.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBSDY
DBSDY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DBSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DBSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ATH.TO
ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR (DBSDY) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBSDYATH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.32

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.53

3.24

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.52

10.81

+5.72

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBSDY Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBSDY and ATH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBSDY drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, smaller than the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBSDY and ATH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBSDYATH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.39%

-99.59%

+25.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-23.14%

+13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-29.96%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.02%

-47.55%

+25.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-94.92%

+50.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-62.47%

+61.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.93%

-76.83%

+61.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

6.93%

-3.77%

Volatility

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR (DBSDY) is 5.82%, while Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that DBSDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBSDYATH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

13.05%

-7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

31.88%

-19.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.57%

37.71%

-21.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.84%

49.97%

-31.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.60%

61.94%

-40.34%

Dividends

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison

DBSDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBSDY
DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR
4.07%4.42%4.94%6.76%4.09%3.11%2.55%6.59%7.22%3.53%7.42%3.77%

Financials

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.89B
377.38M
(DBSDY) Total Revenue
(ATH.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DBSDY values in SGD, ATH.TO values in CAD

DBSDY vs. ATH.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR and Athabasca Oil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
100.0%
35.8%
Portfolio components
DBSDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 11.89B and revenue of 11.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ATH.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 134.91M and revenue of 377.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

DBSDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 2.70B and revenue of 11.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.7%.

ATH.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 90.74M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

DBSDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DBS Group Holdings Ltd ADR reported a net income of 2.26B and revenue of 11.89B, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.

ATH.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DBSDY and ATH.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBSDY and ATH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer