DBSC vs. ROSC
DBSC (Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. DBSC is actively managed, while ROSC is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBSC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
DBSC vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBSC achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 16.64% return.
DBSC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROSC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
DBSC vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DBSC Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF | 5.96% | -0.86% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 16.64% | -1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBSC and ROSC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBSC vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
DBSC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROSC
DBSC vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF (DBSC) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBSC | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBSC vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBSC drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBSC and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBSC | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -43.13% | +26.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -0.33% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -7.18% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility
DBSC vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBSC | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.22% | 15.53% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 19.29% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 20.24% | -1.02% |
DBSC vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBSC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBSC vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
DBSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBSC Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.79% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBSC and ROSC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBSC.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for DBSC.
They also come from different issuers: Deepwater Asset Management and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBSC and 0.34% for ROSC.
Find the right allocation for DBSC and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer