DBSC vs. CSB
DBSC (Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. DBSC is actively managed, while CSB is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBSC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
DBSC vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBSC achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than CSB's 10.17% return.
DBSC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
DBSC vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DBSC Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF | 5.96% | -0.86% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 10.17% | -2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBSC and CSB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBSC vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
DBSC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSB
DBSC vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF (DBSC) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBSC | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBSC vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBSC drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBSC and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBSC | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -42.07% | +25.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -1.75% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -7.11% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
DBSC vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBSC | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.30% | 14.48% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 18.70% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 21.31% | -2.01% |
DBSC vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBSC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBSC vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
DBSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.25% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
DBSC Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBSC and CSB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBSC.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.00% for DBSC.
They also come from different issuers: Deepwater Asset Management and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBSC and 0.35% for CSB.
Find the right allocation for DBSC and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer