DBSC vs. IJR
DBSC (Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. DBSC is actively managed, while IJR is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBSC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.
Performance
DBSC vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBSC achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 19.34% return.
DBSC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 19.34%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
DBSC vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DBSC Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF | 5.96% | -0.86% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 19.34% | -2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBSC and IJR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBSC vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank
DBSC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IJR
DBSC vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF (DBSC) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBSC | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBSC vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBSC drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBSC and IJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBSC | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -58.15% | +41.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -0.43% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -9.26% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.58% | — |
Volatility
DBSC vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBSC | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.22% | 17.73% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 21.40% | -2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 22.90% | -3.68% |
DBSC vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBSC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBSC vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
DBSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBSC Deepwater Beachfront Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBSC and IJR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBSC.
IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for DBSC.
They also come from different issuers: Deepwater Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBSC and 0.06% for IJR.
Find the right allocation for DBSC and IJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer