DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L
DBRC.L (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and DLTM.L (iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBRC.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while DLTM.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBRC.L returned 2.34%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for DLTM.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.
Performance
DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBRC.L achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than DLTM.L's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DBRC.L has underperformed DLTM.L with an annualized return of 2.34%, while DLTM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 6.48% annualized return.
DBRC.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- -11.80%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 1Y
- -5.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- -6.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
DLTM.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 36.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -9.46% | 29.65% | 13.80% | -7.59% | -28.96% | -23.93% | 20.04% | 21.82% | -8.40% | 36.18% |
DLTM.L iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF | 12.18% | 54.38% | -26.87% | 33.35% | 8.00% | -9.77% | -11.18% | 12.80% | -5.26% | 20.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBRC.L and DLTM.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2007 | 0.65 |
The correlation between DBRC.L and DLTM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBRC.L
DLTM.L
DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) and iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBRC.L | DLTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.30 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 2.38 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 6.42 | -6.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBRC.L drawdown since its inception was -70.16%, which is greater than DLTM.L's maximum drawdown of -66.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBRC.L and DLTM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBRC.L | DLTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.16% | -66.54% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -15.38% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.03% | -27.82% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.15% | -29.01% | -28.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.02% | -54.86% | -11.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.62% | -10.52% | -33.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.51% | -28.96% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 5.71% | +5.68% |
Volatility
DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) at 4.52%. This indicates that DBRC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLTM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBRC.L | DLTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 4.52% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 17.39% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 21.07% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.52% | 22.86% | +7.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 26.37% | +0.14% |
DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DBRC.L and DLTM.L have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Dividends
DBRC.L vs. DLTM.L - Dividend Comparison
DBRC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than DLTM.L's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.60% | 1.74% | 2.81% | 2.60% | 3.58% | 1.58% | 1.43% | 2.02% | 2.96% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.68% |
DLTM.L iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF | 3.44% | 3.54% | 5.77% | 4.23% | 6.82% | 3.20% | 1.66% | 2.31% | 2.17% | 1.47% | 1.44% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBRC.L and DLTM.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBRC.L and DLTM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.
DBRC.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DLTM.L is Latin America Equities. DBRC.L tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while DLTM.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD.
Find the right allocation for DBRC.L and DLTM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer