DBRC.L vs. E127.L
DBRC.L (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and E127.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - DBRC.L tracks the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index while E127.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBRC.L returned -6.80%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for E127.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBRC.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for E127.L.
Performance
DBRC.L vs. E127.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DBRC.L is traded in USD, while E127.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the E127.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBRC.L achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than E127.L's 20.35% return.
DBRC.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- -13.46%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- -4.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- -6.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
E127.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- 6M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 38.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- —
DBRC.L vs. E127.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -9.29% | 29.65% | 13.80% | -7.59% | -28.96% | -23.93% | 32.79% |
E127.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.35% | 34.89% | 7.57% | 8.20% | -19.65% | -2.76% | 40.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBRC.L and E127.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DBRC.L and E127.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBRC.L vs. E127.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBRC.L
E127.L
DBRC.L vs. E127.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBRC.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.33 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 2.95 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 9.57 | -9.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBRC.L vs. E127.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBRC.L drawdown since its inception was -70.16%, which is greater than E127.L's maximum drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBRC.L and E127.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBRC.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.16% | -39.93% | -30.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -12.84% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.03% | -16.66% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -34.73% | -22.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.51% | -7.81% | -35.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.51% | -15.54% | -15.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.38% | 3.97% | +7.41% |
Volatility
DBRC.L vs. E127.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) is 6.02%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist (E127.L) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that DBRC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than E127.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBRC.L | E127.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 9.11% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | 19.16% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 21.25% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.52% | 19.17% | +11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 19.00% | +7.51% |
DBRC.L vs. E127.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBRC.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than E127.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBRC.L vs. E127.L - Dividend Comparison
DBRC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than E127.L's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.60% | 1.74% | 2.81% | 2.60% | 3.58% | 1.58% | 1.43% | 2.02% | 2.96% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.68% |
E127.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.80% | 2.16% | 3.35% | 3.76% | 2.34% | 1.64% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBRC.L and E127.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, E127.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
E127.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DBRC.L.
DBRC.L tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while E127.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DBRC.L and 0.14% for E127.L.
Find the right allocation for DBRC.L and E127.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer