PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBPG.DE achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.


DBPG.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.30%
YTD
19.52%
6M
19.10%
1Y
50.49%
3Y*
34.60%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
24.01%

XMME.DE

1D
-1.04%
1M
5.19%
YTD
30.06%
6M
29.85%
1Y
50.91%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBPG.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
19.52%13.51%53.27%44.01%-36.28%78.38%9.47%68.71%-12.05%14.06%
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
30.06%18.69%13.82%5.89%-15.00%4.75%6.57%21.91%-11.16%7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DBPG.DE and XMME.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017

0.64

The correlation between DBPG.DE and XMME.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBPG.DE
DBPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DBPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XMME.DE
XMME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBPG.DEXMME.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.55

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

4.98

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

18.04

-5.38

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBPG.DE and XMME.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBPG.DEXMME.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

3.00

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.51

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.45

+0.33

Drawdowns

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPG.DE and XMME.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBPG.DEXMME.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.28%

-31.96%

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-10.67%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.46%

-19.16%

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.46%

-24.38%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-1.04%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-9.53%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

2.95%

+1.07%

Volatility

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) is 5.65%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that DBPG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBPG.DEXMME.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

7.48%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

14.90%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.46%

17.70%

+4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.11%

16.74%

+13.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.48%

18.61%

+12.87%

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBPG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBPG.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBPG.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DBPG.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBPG.DE.

DBPG.DE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. DBPG.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBPG.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBPG.DE and XMME.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer