PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBP vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBP vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBP achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DBP has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 12.31%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


DBP

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
2.13%
6M
8.68%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
32.54%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
12.31%

SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBP vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.13%73.43%26.71%8.68%-1.51%-7.10%26.79%15.89%-4.31%10.58%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DBP and SPHQ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.11

The correlation between DBP and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBP vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBP
SPHQ

Financial Services

100.5%
13.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

15.4%

Energy

-

0.7%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

24.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

28.1%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Financial Services

DBP
100.5%
SPHQ
13.3%

Basic Materials

DBP

-

SPHQ
2.2%

Communication Services

DBP

-

SPHQ
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DBP

-

SPHQ
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

DBP

-

SPHQ
15.4%

Energy

DBP

-

SPHQ
0.7%

Healthcare

DBP

-

SPHQ
8.4%

Industrials

DBP

-

SPHQ
24.3%

Real Estate

DBP

-

SPHQ

-

Technology

DBP

-

SPHQ
28.1%

Utilities

DBP

-

SPHQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBP vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBP
DBP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBP Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBP Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBP vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBPSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.62

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

11.17

-7.16

DBP vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBP and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBPSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.85

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.89

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.84

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.53

-0.10

Drawdowns

DBP vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBPSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-57.83%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.48%

-8.90%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

-16.57%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

-25.04%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.36%

-31.60%

+3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.04%

0.00%

-23.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-10.70%

-14.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

2.08%

+8.59%

Volatility

DBP vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.49%. This indicates that DBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBPSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

3.49%

+4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.87%

10.18%

+19.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.57%

12.62%

+19.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.91%

16.45%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

17.86%

+0.86%

DBP vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBP vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.38%2.44%4.21%4.47%0.45%0.00%0.00%1.26%1.24%0.12%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBP and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBP has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to SPHQ (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.01% vs 12.31% for DBP. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.

DBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

DBP is categorized as Precious Metals, while SPHQ is S&P 500. DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBP and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer