DBP vs. SLVP
DBP (Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBP is a Precious Metals fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBP returned 10.50%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for SLVP. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
DBP vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBP achieves a -7.35% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DBP has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 10.50%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.
DBP
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- -11.00%
- YTD
- -7.35%
- 6M
- -11.28%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
SLVP
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -11.26%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -13.08%
- 1Y
- 78.29%
- 3Y*
- 50.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
DBP vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | -7.35% | 73.43% | 26.71% | 8.68% | -1.51% | -7.10% | 26.79% | 15.89% | -4.31% | 10.58% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -9.48% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBP and SLVP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.73 |
The correlation between DBP and SLVP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBP vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
DBP
SLVP
DBP vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBP | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 2.07 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 5.23 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBP vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBP | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.89% | -80.47% | +26.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.18% | -38.06% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.18% | -38.06% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.18% | -48.01% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.18% | -62.03% | +31.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.18% | -34.70% | +4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -46.75% | +21.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 15.00% | -2.70% |
Volatility
DBP vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) is 8.93%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 19.48%. This indicates that DBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBP | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 19.48% | -10.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.96% | 45.96% | -15.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.62% | 55.40% | -21.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 43.31% | -22.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 42.55% | -23.72% |
DBP vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBP vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than SLVP's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | 2.63% | 2.44% | 4.21% | 4.47% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 1.24% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBP and SLVP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.48%) compared to DBP (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
On 10-year performance, SLVP leads with 11.46% vs 10.50% for DBP. On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DBP has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 11.46% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.
DBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.28% for SLVP.
DBP is categorized as Precious Metals, while SLVP is Silver. DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.39% for SLVP.
SLVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBP and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer