PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBP vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBP vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBP achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DBP has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 12.31%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.


DBP

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
2.13%
6M
8.68%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
32.54%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
12.31%

GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBP vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.13%73.43%26.71%8.68%-1.51%-7.10%26.79%15.89%-4.31%10.58%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DBP and GDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.78

The correlation between DBP and GDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBP vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBP
GDX

Financial Services

100.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DBP
100.5%
GDX

-

Basic Materials

DBP

-

GDX
100.0%

Communication Services

DBP

-

GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

DBP

-

GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

DBP

-

GDX

-

Energy

DBP

-

GDX

-

Healthcare

DBP

-

GDX

-

Industrials

DBP

-

GDX

-

Real Estate

DBP

-

GDX

-

Technology

DBP

-

GDX

-

Utilities

DBP

-

GDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBP vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBP
DBP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBP Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBP Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBP vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBPGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.00

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

5.13

-1.12

DBP vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBP and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBPGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.35

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.52

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.38

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.13

+0.30

Drawdowns

DBP vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBPGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-80.34%

+26.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.48%

-30.84%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

-30.84%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

-46.51%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.36%

-49.79%

+21.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.04%

-26.62%

+3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-40.43%

+15.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

11.99%

-1.32%

Volatility

DBP vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) is 7.57%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that DBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBPGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

15.40%

-7.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.87%

37.50%

-7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.57%

45.49%

-12.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.91%

36.39%

-15.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

37.18%

-18.46%

DBP vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBP vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.38%2.44%4.21%4.47%0.45%0.00%0.00%1.26%1.24%0.12%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBP and GDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to DBP (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 12.31% for DBP. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, DBP has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.

DBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.

DBP is categorized as Precious Metals, while GDX is Gold. DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.51% for GDX.

GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBP and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer