DBP vs. GDX
DBP (Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBP is a Precious Metals fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBP returned 12.31%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for GDX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
DBP vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBP achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DBP has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 12.31%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
DBP
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 42.65%
- 3Y*
- 32.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
DBP vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | 2.13% | 73.43% | 26.71% | 8.68% | -1.51% | -7.10% | 26.79% | 15.89% | -4.31% | 10.58% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBP and GDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DBP and GDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBP vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBP
GDX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DBP
GDX
-
Basic Materials
DBP
-
GDX
Communication Services
DBP
-
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
DBP
-
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
DBP
-
GDX
-
Energy
DBP
-
GDX
-
Healthcare
DBP
-
GDX
-
Industrials
DBP
-
GDX
-
Real Estate
DBP
-
GDX
-
Technology
DBP
-
GDX
-
Utilities
DBP
-
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBP vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
DBP
GDX
DBP vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBP | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 2.00 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 5.13 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBP | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.52 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.38 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.13 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
DBP vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBP | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.89% | -80.34% | +26.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.48% | -30.84% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.48% | -30.84% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.48% | -46.51% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.36% | -49.79% | +21.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.04% | -26.62% | +3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -40.43% | +15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.67% | 11.99% | -1.32% |
Volatility
DBP vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) is 7.57%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that DBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBP | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | 15.40% | -7.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.87% | 37.50% | -7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.57% | 45.49% | -12.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 36.39% | -15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 37.18% | -18.46% |
DBP vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBP vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | 2.38% | 2.44% | 4.21% | 4.47% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 1.24% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBP and GDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to DBP (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 12.31% for DBP. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, DBP has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.
DBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
DBP is categorized as Precious Metals, while GDX is Gold. DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.51% for GDX.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBP and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer