DBO vs. UNL
DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) and UNL (United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP) are both Oil & Gas funds - DBO tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return while UNL tracks the 12 Month Natural Gas. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBO returned 10.29%/yr vs -5.18%/yr for UNL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UNL.
Performance
DBO vs. UNL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBO achieves a 63.77% return, which is significantly higher than UNL's -17.87% return. Over the past 10 years, DBO has outperformed UNL with an annualized return of 10.29%, while UNL has yielded a comparatively lower -5.18% annualized return.
DBO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- 6M
- 54.17%
- YTD
- 63.77%
- 1Y
- 51.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
UNL
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -11.25%
- YTD
- -17.87%
- 1Y
- -31.67%
- 3Y*
- -18.31%
- 5Y*
- -9.64%
- 10Y*
- -5.18%
DBO vs. UNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 63.77% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -15.22% | 4.86% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | -17.87% | -9.67% | -4.78% | -50.20% | 47.01% | 54.42% | -9.54% | -18.78% | 12.53% | -21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBO and UNL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | 0.13 |
The correlation between DBO and UNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBO vs. UNL — Risk / Return Rank
DBO
UNL
DBO vs. UNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) and United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBO | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.85 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.97 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | -1.60 | +6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBO vs. UNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, roughly equal to the maximum UNL drawdown of -89.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBO and UNL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBO | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.18% | -89.32% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.73% | -32.78% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.20% | -49.67% | +21.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.68% | -78.75% | +41.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -78.75% | +17.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.90% | -89.26% | +32.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.22% | -73.44% | +11.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.23% | 19.76% | -9.53% |
Volatility
DBO vs. UNL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a higher volatility of 14.35% compared to United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) at 5.72%. This indicates that DBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBO | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.35% | 5.72% | +8.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.17% | 28.88% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.05% | 35.12% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.93% | 41.75% | -8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 33.84% | -1.92% |
DBO vs. UNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than UNL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBO vs. UNL - Dividend Comparison
DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while UNL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.14% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBO and UNL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to UNL (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBO dropped -90.18% vs UNL's -89.32%.
On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 10.29% vs -5.18% for UNL. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, UNL has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 10.29% return vs -5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for UNL.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for UNL.
DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return, while UNL tracks 12 Month Natural Gas. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBO and 0.90% for UNL.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBO and UNL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer