DBO vs. BPH
DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. DBO is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DBO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
DBO vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DBO
- 1D
- -5.70%
- 1M
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 40.20%
- YTD
- 57.21%
- 1Y
- 44.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.08%
BPH
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- 12.03%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.76K | $51.75K | $50.82K | |
| $11.97M | $10.83M | $13.36M |
DBO vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | -14.76% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBO and BPH is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBO vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
DBO
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBO vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBO | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBO vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBO and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBO | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.18% | -15.58% | -74.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.63% | -5.73% | -52.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.19% | -5.56% | -56.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.22% | — | — |
Volatility
DBO vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBO | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.23% | 29.90% | +9.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.50% | 29.90% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 29.90% | +2.39% |
DBO vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBO vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than BPH's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.23% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBO and BPH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.50% for BPH.
DBO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBO and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for DBO and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer