PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBMF vs. VWCE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DBMF is traded in USD, while VWCE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VWCE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DBMF having a 10.27% return and VWCE.DE slightly lower at 10.00%.


DBMF

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
10.27%
6M
11.24%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*

VWCE.DE

1D
1.71%
1M
0.00%
YTD
10.00%
6M
11.71%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
10.27%13.85%7.24%-8.94%21.61%11.49%1.80%4.90%
VWCE.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
10.00%23.23%17.30%21.91%-18.24%18.47%15.65%7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and VWCE.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2019

0.13

Over the past year, DBMF and VWCE.DE have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VWCE.DE
VWCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBMFVWCE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

2.86

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.30

11.93

+4.37

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and VWCE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum VWCE.DE drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and VWCE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBMFVWCE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.39%

-33.91%

+13.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-8.91%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.60%

-17.27%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-26.11%

+5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-2.01%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-5.43%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.14%

-0.46%

Volatility

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is 2.71%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that DBMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWCE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBMFVWCE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

3.93%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

9.70%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

12.46%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.55%

15.33%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.41%

17.33%

-4.92%

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VWCE.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBMF vs. VWCE.DE - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, while VWCE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.19%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%
VWCE.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBMF and VWCE.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWCE.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWCE.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while VWCE.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.19% for VWCE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBMF and VWCE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer