PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBMF vs. VIXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBMF vs. VIXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly higher than VIXY's -17.20% return.


DBMF

1D
0.23%
1M
0.57%
6M
8.74%
YTD
11.26%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.22%

VIXY

1D
-1.94%
1M
-3.06%
6M
-17.07%
YTD
-17.20%
1Y
-51.71%
3Y*
-39.30%
5Y*
-46.62%
10Y*
-46.88%
ALL TIME*
-48.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBMF vs. VIXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
11.26%13.85%7.24%-8.94%21.61%11.49%1.80%10.51%
VIXY
ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-17.20%-43.05%-27.43%-72.74%-24.98%-72.40%10.54%-51.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and VIXY is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

-0.18

The correlation between DBMF and VIXY shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBMF vs. VIXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VIXY
VIXY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VIXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VIXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIXY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMF vs. VIXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBMFVIXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.84

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

-0.94

+5.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

-1.49

+16.41

DBMF vs. VIXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the VIXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and VIXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. VIXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum VIXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and VIXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBMFVIXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.39%

-100.00%

+79.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-55.18%

+49.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.60%

-81.45%

+65.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-96.09%

+75.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-100.00%

+98.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-92.22%

+85.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

34.75%

-32.95%

Volatility

DBMF vs. VIXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is 2.69%, while ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) has a volatility of 12.30%. This indicates that DBMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBMFVIXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

12.30%

-9.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

44.49%

-34.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

56.84%

-44.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

69.94%

-57.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.37%

71.86%

-59.49%

DBMF vs. VIXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DBMF and VIXY have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

DBMF vs. VIXY - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, while VIXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.11%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%
VIXY
ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBMF and VIXY have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIXY has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to DBMF (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs VIXY's -100.00%.

On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 8.59% vs -46.62% for VIXY. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 8.59% return vs -46.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBMF and VIXY have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 0.00% for VIXY.

DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while VIXY is Volatility. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and ProShares.

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBMF and VIXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer