DBMF vs. VEE.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and VEE.TO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while VEE.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index. DBMF is actively managed, while VEE.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 8.01%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for VEE.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for VEE.TO.

Performance

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DBMF is traded in USD, while VEE.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the VEE.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBMF having a 10.27% return and VEE.TO slightly higher at 10.42%.

DBMF

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 11.24%
• 1Y: 26.94%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: —

VEE.TO

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 12.32%
• 1Y: 26.08%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: 4.26%
• 10Y*: 8.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.27%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.51%
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF	10.42%	25.02%	9.77%	8.83%	-17.98%	0.10%	15.05%	7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and VEE.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019	0.11

The correlation between DBMF and VEE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBMF	VEE.TO
Technology	29.8%	26.3%
Healthcare	12.7%	4.1%
Financial Services	12.5%	20.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	11.2%
Communication Services	8.6%	7.8%
Industrials	8.4%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	3.9%
Energy	3.9%	4.7%
Real Estate	2.5%	2.3%
Utilities	2.3%	3.0%
Basic Materials	2.2%	8.4%

Return for Risk

DBMF vs. VEE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

VEE.TO

VEE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 59
VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VEE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
VEE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
VEE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
VEE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBMF	VEE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.47	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.09	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.27	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.50	2.25	+2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.30	7.89	+8.41

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the VEE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and VEE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum VEE.TO drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and VEE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBMF	VEE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.39%	-36.79%	+16.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.10%	-10.97%	+4.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	-17.99%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	-33.33%	+12.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-2.61%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.56%	-12.69%	+6.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	3.12%	-1.44%

Volatility

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is 2.71%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF (VEE.TO) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that DBMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBMF	VEE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	6.95%	-4.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.00%	13.97%	-3.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.35%	16.75%	-4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.55%	16.54%	-3.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.41%	18.07%	-5.66%

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VEE.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBMF vs. VEE.TO - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than VEE.TO's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.19%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEE.TO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF	1.93%	2.26%	2.45%	2.83%	3.35%	2.18%	1.62%	2.71%	2.24%	1.93%	2.01%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBMF and VEE.TO in my portfolio?

DBMF and VEE.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DBMF or VEE.TO?

On fees, VEE.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBMF or VEE.TO?

VEE.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

What is the main difference between DBMF and VEE.TO?

DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while VEE.TO is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.25% for VEE.TO.