DBMF vs. PFIX
DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while PFIX is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 8.46%/yr vs 16.86%/yr for PFIX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PFIX.
Performance
DBMF vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than PFIX's -2.55% return.
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
PFIX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- -15.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- —
DBMF vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.42% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 0.78% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | -2.55% | 0.42% | 35.94% | 5.67% | 92.05% | -24.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBMF and PFIX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between DBMF and PFIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DBMF vs. PFIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBMF
PFIX
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
DBMF
PFIX
-
Healthcare
DBMF
PFIX
-
Financial Services
DBMF
PFIX
Consumer Cyclical
DBMF
PFIX
-
Communication Services
DBMF
PFIX
-
Industrials
DBMF
PFIX
-
Consumer Defensive
DBMF
PFIX
-
Energy
DBMF
PFIX
-
Real Estate
DBMF
PFIX
-
Utilities
DBMF
PFIX
-
Basic Materials
DBMF
PFIX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBMF vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank
DBMF
PFIX
DBMF vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBMF | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 0.93 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | -0.61 | +5.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.07 | -0.96 | +20.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBMF | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | -0.52 | +3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.44 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.39 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
DBMF vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and PFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBMF | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.39% | -36.17% | +15.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -25.64% | +19.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | -36.17% | +20.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -36.17% | +15.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -19.65% | +19.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -17.13% | +10.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 16.35% | -14.70% |
Volatility
DBMF vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is 2.12%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that DBMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBMF | PFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 7.51% | -5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 20.89% | -11.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 30.32% | -18.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 38.50% | -25.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 38.35% | -25.94% |
DBMF vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBMF vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison
DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than PFIX's 9.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.09% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 9.96% | 9.92% | 3.40% | 87.92% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBMF and PFIX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFIX has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to DBMF (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs PFIX's -36.17%.
On 5-year performance, PFIX leads with 16.86% vs 8.46% for DBMF. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 9.96%, compared with 5.09% for DBMF.
DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while PFIX is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.50% for PFIX.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBMF and PFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer