DBMF vs. MMAX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while MMAX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DBMF returned 26.94% vs 7.44% for MMAX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MMAX.

Performance

DBMF vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than MMAX's 3.03% return.

DBMF

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 11.24%
• 1Y: 26.94%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: —

MMAX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBMF vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.27%	17.08%
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	3.03%	6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and MMAX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

DBMF vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

MMAX

MMAX Risk / Return Rank: 98
MMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMF vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBMF	MMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	5.15	-2.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	9.36	-6.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	2.35	-0.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.50	15.81	-11.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.30	86.95	-70.65

DBMF vs. MMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the MMAX Sharpe Ratio of 5.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and MMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and MMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBMF	MMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.39%	-1.93%	-18.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.10%	-0.46%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-0.18%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.56%	-0.10%	-6.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	0.08%	+1.60%

Volatility

DBMF vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) at 0.45%. This indicates that DBMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBMF	MMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	0.45%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.00%	1.04%	+8.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.35%	1.42%	+10.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.55%	2.49%	+10.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.41%	2.49%	+9.92%

DBMF vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBMF vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than MMAX's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.19%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	1.27%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBMF and MMAX in my portfolio?

DBMF and MMAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBMF or MMAX?

DBMF has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to MMAX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs MMAX's -1.93%.

Which ETF is better, DBMF or MMAX?

On 1-year performance, DBMF leads with 26.94% vs 7.44% for MMAX. On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBMF or MMAX?

Over the 1-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 26.94% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBMF or MMAX?

MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBMF or MMAX?

DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 1.27% for MMAX.

What is the main difference between DBMF and MMAX?

DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while MMAX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.50% for MMAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.15 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.