DBMF vs. IEAA.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and IEAA.L (iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while IEAA.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. DBMF is actively managed, while IEAA.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 7.92%/yr vs -1.06%/yr for IEAA.L. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IEAA.L.

Performance

DBMF vs. IEAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DBMF is traded in USD, while IEAA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEAA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than IEAA.L's -1.46% return.

DBMF

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 6M: 12.63%
• 1Y: 29.05%
• 3Y*: 10.02%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: —

IEAA.L

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: -1.46%
• 6M: -0.16%
• 1Y: 3.33%
• 3Y*: 7.01%
• 5Y*: -1.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBMF vs. IEAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.45%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.67%
IEAA.L iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)	-1.46%	16.92%	-2.04%	10.87%	-18.60%	-7.85%	11.79%	2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and IEAA.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019	-0.11

The correlation between DBMF and IEAA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (5 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DBMF vs. IEAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

IEAA.L

IEAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
IEAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
IEAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
IEAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
IEAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMF vs. IEAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBMF	IEAA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	0.43	+1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	0.67	+2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.08	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.78	0.51	+4.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.53	1.38	+16.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBMF vs. IEAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the IEAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and IEAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBMF	IEAA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	0.43	+1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	-0.11	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.05	+0.70

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. IEAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum IEAA.L drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and IEAA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBMF	IEAA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.39%	-34.71%	+14.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.10%	-6.58%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	-8.36%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	-33.42%	+13.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-6.91%	+5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.58%	-11.52%	+4.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	2.42%	-0.76%

Volatility

DBMF vs. IEAA.L - Volatility Comparison

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IEAA.L) at 2.35%. This indicates that DBMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBMF	IEAA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	2.35%	+0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	5.91%	+4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	7.71%	+4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.56%	9.36%	+3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.43%	8.80%	+3.63%

DBMF vs. IEAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IEAA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBMF vs. IEAA.L - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, while IEAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.18%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
IEAA.L iShares Core Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBMF and IEAA.L in my portfolio?

DBMF and IEAA.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DBMF or IEAA.L?

On fees, IEAA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBMF or IEAA.L?

IEAA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

What is the main difference between DBMF and IEAA.L?

DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while IEAA.L is European Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.20% for IEAA.L.