DBLSX vs. LCCMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DBLSX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund) and LCCMX (Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, DBLSX returned 2.87%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for LCCMX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBLSX charges 0.41%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for LCCMX.

Performance

DBLSX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLSX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than LCCMX's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLSX has underperformed LCCMX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while LCCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.26% annualized return.

DBLSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: 2.87%

LCCMX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 6.33%
• 1Y: 11.06%
• 3Y*: 14.65%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: 4.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBLSX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund	1.06%	5.74%	5.32%	6.76%	-2.69%	0.70%	2.02%	4.73%	1.40%	2.65%
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	3.89%	9.73%	18.51%	13.73%	-13.30%	1.30%	7.52%	0.65%	2.35%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLSX and LCCMX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2011	0.16

The correlation between DBLSX and LCCMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DBLSX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBLSX

DBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 97
DBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
DBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

LCCMX

LCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 79
LCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
LCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBLSX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBLSX	LCCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.76	2.51	+1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.30	5.49	+0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.06	2.03	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.37	3.26	+3.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	29.20	11.51	+17.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBLSX vs. LCCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the LCCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLSX and LCCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBLSX	LCCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76	2.51	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.28	1.04	+1.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	0.67	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.81	-0.76

Drawdowns

DBLSX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLSX drawdown since its inception was -57.22%, which is greater than LCCMX's maximum drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLSX and LCCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBLSX	LCCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.22%	-24.57%	-32.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.72%	-3.76%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.72%	-3.76%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.71%	-19.20%	+14.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.22%	-24.57%	-32.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.00%	0.00%	-45.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.51%	-2.80%	-28.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.16%	1.06%	-0.90%

Volatility

DBLSX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) is 0.42%, while Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that DBLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBLSX	LCCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	0.68%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.89%	4.12%	-3.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21%	4.54%	-3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.39%	5.84%	-4.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.99%	6.35%	+57.64%

DBLSX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBLSX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison

DBLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than LCCMX's 8.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund	4.55%	4.64%	5.09%	4.49%	2.50%	1.72%	2.37%	3.21%	2.92%	2.42%	2.52%	2.47%
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	8.53%	8.93%	10.39%	8.55%	5.68%	2.11%	2.11%	2.98%	2.89%	2.10%	2.01%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBLSX and LCCMX in my portfolio?

DBLSX and LCCMX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBLSX or LCCMX?

LCCMX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to DBLSX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLSX dropped -57.22% vs LCCMX's -24.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.