DBLLX vs. DBLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX).
DBLLX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2014. DBLTX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010.
Performance
DBLLX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBLLX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 0.02% | 7.86% | 7.20% | 7.00% | -5.05% | -0.21% | 3.53% | 8.57% | -0.04% | 4.20% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.20% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLLX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than DBLTX's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLLX has outperformed DBLTX with an annualized return of 3.62%, while DBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.
DBLLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
DBLTX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBLLX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBLLX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank
DBLLX
DBLTX
DBLLX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBLLX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.75 | 1.12 | +2.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.19 | 1.62 | +3.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.29 | 1.20 | +1.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 1.84 | +2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.50 | 5.47 | +16.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBLLX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75 | 1.12 | +2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.72 | 0.15 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.91 | 0.42 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.92 | +0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLLX and DBLTX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DBLLX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison
DBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than DBLTX's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 5.01% | 5.27% | 4.70% | 3.74% | 2.41% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 4.93% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 3.19% | 3.77% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.43% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
Drawdowns
DBLLX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLLX drawdown since its inception was -10.13%, smaller than the maximum DBLTX drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLLX and DBLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLLX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -16.49% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | -2.88% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.13% | -16.49% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.13% | -16.49% | +6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -2.21% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -2.38% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.97% | -0.72% |
Volatility
DBLLX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) is 0.35%, while DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that DBLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBLLX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 1.74% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.75% | 2.64% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43% | 4.23% | -2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.93% | 5.56% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.90% | 4.38% | -2.48% |