DBLLX vs. AMAPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DBLLX (DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund) and AMAPX (Amana Participation Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, DBLLX returned 3.50%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for AMAPX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBLLX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for AMAPX.

Performance

DBLLX vs. AMAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLLX achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than AMAPX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLLX has outperformed AMAPX with an annualized return of 3.50%, while AMAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.

DBLLX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.31%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: 6.90%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 3.50%

AMAPX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.56%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 4.03%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: 1.34%
• 10Y*: 2.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBLLX vs. AMAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund	1.31%	7.86%	7.20%	7.00%	-5.05%	-0.21%	3.53%	8.57%	-0.04%	4.20%
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund	0.36%	5.98%	3.77%	2.09%	-5.27%	0.49%	5.35%	6.61%	0.08%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLLX and AMAPX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015	0.45

The correlation between DBLLX and AMAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DBLLX vs. AMAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBLLX

DBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 98
DBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

AMAPX

AMAPX Risk / Return Rank: 47
AMAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
AMAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
AMAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AMAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
AMAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBLLX vs. AMAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBLLX	AMAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.51	1.83	+2.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.16	2.99	+5.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.49	1.54	+0.94
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.62	1.61	+4.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.52	5.13	+20.38

DBLLX vs. AMAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 4.51, which is higher than the AMAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLLX and AMAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBLLX vs. AMAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLLX drawdown since its inception was -10.13%, which is greater than AMAPX's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLLX and AMAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBLLX	AMAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.13%	-7.75%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.92%	-2.51%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.35%	-2.63%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.13%	-7.75%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.13%	-7.75%	-2.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-0.50%	+0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-1.56%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	0.79%	-0.59%

Volatility

DBLLX vs. AMAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) is 0.34%, while Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that DBLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBLLX	AMAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	1.20%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.92%	2.01%	-1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15%	2.22%	-1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.94%	2.19%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.90%	2.01%	-0.11%

DBLLX vs. AMAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAPX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBLLX vs. AMAPX - Dividend Comparison

DBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than AMAPX's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund	3.66%	3.52%	3.15%	2.25%	1.30%	1.55%	1.95%	2.45%	2.62%	2.14%	2.14%	0.00%
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund	5.07%	5.27%	4.70%	3.74%	2.41%	2.15%	2.61%	4.93%	2.87%	3.00%	3.19%	3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBLLX and AMAPX in my portfolio?

DBLLX and AMAPX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBLLX or AMAPX?

AMAPX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to DBLLX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLLX dropped -10.13% vs AMAPX's -7.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.