DBLGX vs. DFGBX
DBLGX (DoubleLine Global Bond Fund) and DFGBX (DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, DBLGX returned -0.97%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for DFGBX. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DBLGX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for DFGBX.
Performance
DBLGX vs. DFGBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLGX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than DFGBX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLGX has underperformed DFGBX with an annualized return of -0.97%, while DFGBX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.21% annualized return.
DBLGX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 1.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.75%
- 5Y*
- -2.48%
- 10Y*
- -0.97%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.23%
DFGBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DBLGX vs. DFGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLGX DoubleLine Global Bond Fund | -0.58% | 10.13% | -3.58% | 4.36% | -16.16% | -7.79% | 4.80% | 4.00% | -2.10% | 8.20% |
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 1.50% | 3.13% | 5.37% | 5.00% | -6.63% | -1.03% | 1.52% | 4.04% | 1.68% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLGX and DFGBX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.46 |
The correlation between DBLGX and DFGBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBLGX vs. DFGBX — Risk / Return Rank
DBLGX
DFGBX
DBLGX vs. DFGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Global Bond Fund (DBLGX) and DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBLGX | DFGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.53 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 2.37 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 8.15 | -6.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBLGX vs. DFGBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLGX drawdown since its inception was -27.45%, which is greater than DFGBX's maximum drawdown of -9.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLGX and DFGBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLGX | DFGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.45% | -9.63% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.76% | -1.38% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.16% | -1.67% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.88% | -9.54% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.45% | -9.63% | -17.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.13% | -0.30% | -14.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -0.93% | -9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 0.40% | +1.50% |
Volatility
DBLGX vs. DFGBX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Global Bond Fund (DBLGX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) at 0.51%. This indicates that DBLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBLGX | DFGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 0.51% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.70% | 1.41% | +3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.69% | 1.55% | +4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 2.18% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 1.92% | +3.83% |
DBLGX vs. DFGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLGX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGBX's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBLGX vs. DFGBX - Dividend Comparison
DBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than DFGBX's 4.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLGX DoubleLine Global Bond Fund | 3.44% | 2.61% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 1.58% | 1.21% | 1.16% | 1.20% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 4.61% | 2.91% | 4.69% | 3.61% | 1.63% | 0.73% | 0.03% | 2.30% | 4.74% | 0.89% | 1.16% | 1.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBLGX and DFGBX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBLGX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to DFGBX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLGX dropped -27.45% vs DFGBX's -9.63%.
DFGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBLGX and DFGBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer