DBLGX vs. TPINX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBLGX (DoubleLine Global Bond Fund) and TPINX (Templeton Global Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, DBLGX returned -0.75%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TPINX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBLGX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for TPINX.

Performance

DBLGX vs. TPINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Global Bond Fund (DBLGX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLGX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than TPINX's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLGX has underperformed TPINX with an annualized return of -0.75%, while TPINX has yielded a comparatively higher 0.29% annualized return.

DBLGX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: 3.40%
• 5Y*: -2.21%
• 10Y*: -0.75%

TPINX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: 2.33%
• 5Y*: -0.77%
• 10Y*: 0.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBLGX vs. TPINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBLGX DoubleLine Global Bond Fund	0.60%	10.13%	-3.58%	4.36%	-16.16%	-7.79%	4.80%	4.00%	-2.10%	8.20%
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	2.14%	15.02%	-11.95%	2.45%	-6.17%	-5.06%	-4.41%	0.63%	1.26%	2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLGX and TPINX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.30

Over the past year, DBLGX and TPINX have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

DBLGX vs. TPINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBLGX

DBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 9
DBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
DBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
DBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

TPINX

TPINX Risk / Return Rank: 11
TPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
TPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
TPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBLGX vs. TPINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Global Bond Fund (DBLGX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBLGX	TPINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	0.92	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	1.36	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.17	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	1.05	-0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.71	3.44	-0.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBLGX vs. TPINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the TPINX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLGX and TPINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBLGX	TPINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	0.92	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.34	-0.10	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.13	0.04	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.77	-0.79

Drawdowns

DBLGX vs. TPINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLGX drawdown since its inception was -27.45%, roughly equal to the maximum TPINX drawdown of -26.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLGX and TPINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBLGX	TPINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.45%	-26.45%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.76%	-6.36%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.39%	-13.03%	+5.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.17%	-19.15%	-6.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.45%	-26.45%	-1.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.12%	-13.05%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.99%	-4.84%	-5.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.93%	-0.37%

Volatility

DBLGX vs. TPINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Global Bond Fund (DBLGX) is 2.02%, while Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) has a volatility of 2.13%. This indicates that DBLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBLGX	TPINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	2.13%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.39%	5.93%	-1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.60%	7.23%	-1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.51%	8.13%	-1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.74%	7.27%	-1.53%

DBLGX vs. TPINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLGX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than TPINX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBLGX vs. TPINX - Dividend Comparison

DBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than TPINX's 5.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBLGX DoubleLine Global Bond Fund	3.32%	2.61%	1.04%	0.00%	0.00%	1.12%	1.58%	1.21%	1.16%	1.20%	0.52%	0.00%
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	5.03%	4.29%	5.77%	3.87%	5.17%	5.38%	4.59%	6.12%	6.53%	3.34%	2.33%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBLGX and TPINX in my portfolio?

DBLGX and TPINX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBLGX or TPINX?

TPINX has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to DBLGX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLGX dropped -27.45% vs TPINX's -26.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.