DBLFX vs. DBLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX).
DBLFX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Jun 1, 2010. DBLTX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010.
Performance
DBLFX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBLFX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLFX DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.95% | 7.54% | 3.04% | 6.44% | -12.76% | -0.34% | 5.61% | 7.99% | -0.01% | 4.66% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.54% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLFX achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than DBLTX's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLFX has outperformed DBLTX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while DBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.80% annualized return.
DBLFX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- -0.95%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
DBLTX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBLFX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBLFX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank
DBLFX
DBLTX
DBLFX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBLFX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.98 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.51 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.46 | 4.43 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBLFX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.98 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.13 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.41 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.91 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLFX and DBLTX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DBLFX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison
DBLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, which matches DBLTX's 4.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLFX DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.40% | 4.87% | 5.22% | 4.66% | 3.99% | 3.12% | 3.17% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.95% | 3.59% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.44% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
Drawdowns
DBLFX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLFX drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, roughly equal to the maximum DBLTX drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLFX and DBLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLFX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.09% | -16.49% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -2.88% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.09% | -16.49% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.09% | -16.49% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -2.54% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -2.38% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.98% | -0.12% |
Volatility
DBLFX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund (DBLFX) is 1.54%, while DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that DBLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBLFX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.70% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.42% | 2.64% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96% | 4.23% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 5.56% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 4.38% | -0.11% |