DBLEX vs. DBLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX).
DBLEX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 5, 2010. DBLTX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010.
Performance
DBLEX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBLEX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLEX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | -0.99% | 8.39% | 8.20% | 9.64% | -15.30% | 1.97% | 4.85% | 11.80% | -3.20% | 8.48% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.20% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLEX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than DBLTX's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLEX has outperformed DBLTX with an annualized return of 4.02%, while DBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.
DBLEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
DBLTX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBLEX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLEX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBLEX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank
DBLEX
DBLTX
DBLEX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBLEX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 1.12 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 1.62 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.20 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.84 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | 5.47 | +1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBLEX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.12 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.15 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.42 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.92 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLEX and DBLTX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DBLEX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison
DBLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than DBLTX's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLEX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 5.12% | 5.59% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 4.77% | 4.00% | 4.37% | 4.57% | 3.83% | 4.33% | 4.54% | 5.21% |
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.43% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
Drawdowns
DBLEX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLEX drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than DBLTX's maximum drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLEX and DBLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLEX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -16.49% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.88% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -16.49% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | -16.49% | -8.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -2.21% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -2.38% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.97% | -0.34% |
Volatility
DBLEX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) is 0.66%, while DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that DBLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBLEX | DBLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 1.74% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.42% | 2.64% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 4.23% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.52% | 5.56% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 4.38% | +0.27% |