DBL vs. FV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DBL (DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund) and FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) are both funds - DBL is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while FV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index. DBL is actively managed, while FV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBL returned 1.70%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for FV. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DBL charges 2.43%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FV.

Performance

DBL vs. FV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBL achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than FV's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DBL has underperformed FV with an annualized return of 1.70%, while FV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.

DBL

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: -2.95%
• YTD: -2.96%
• 1Y: 0.18%
• 3Y*: 8.11%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 1.70%
• ALL TIME*: 4.65%

FV

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -4.12%
• 6M: 4.75%
• YTD: 10.69%
• 1Y: 17.06%
• 3Y*: 13.04%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 12.51%
• ALL TIME*: 11.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBL DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund	$877.24K	$858.54K	$843.60K
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF	$3.94M	$4.39M	$4.97M

DBL vs. FV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBL DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund	-2.96%	7.16%	10.05%	13.11%	-15.83%	4.61%	3.93%	16.74%	-6.24%	4.49%
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF	10.69%	7.23%	14.73%	11.34%	-3.93%	21.63%	28.36%	25.73%	-8.27%	19.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DBL and FV is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014	0.19

Return for Risk

DBL vs. FV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBL

DBL Risk / Return Rank: 5
DBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
DBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
DBL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
DBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
DBL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

FV

FV Risk / Return Rank: 34
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBL vs. FV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBL	FV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	0.86	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.18	1.27	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.16	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	1.13	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.24	3.72	-3.48

DBL vs. FV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the FV Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBL and FV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBL vs. FV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBL drawdown since its inception was -26.45%, smaller than the maximum FV drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBL and FV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBL	FV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.45%	-34.04%	+7.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.72%	-13.45%	+7.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.72%	-23.08%	+17.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.54%	-23.08%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.45%	-34.04%	+7.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	-8.38%	+4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-5.81%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	4.10%	-1.69%

Volatility

DBL vs. FV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund (DBL) is 1.37%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that DBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBL	FV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	6.58%	-5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.20%	15.02%	-9.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.92%	17.67%	-10.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.48%	21.08%	-9.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.38%	21.55%	-7.17%

DBL vs. FV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBL has a 2.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FV's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBL vs. FV - Dividend Comparison

DBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, more than FV's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBL DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit Fund	9.40%	8.66%	8.52%	8.60%	8.89%	7.17%	8.69%	6.83%	10.27%	9.03%	8.68%	9.35%
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF	0.52%	0.63%	0.14%	0.47%	1.38%	0.11%	0.06%	0.56%	0.19%	0.67%	0.95%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBL and FV in my portfolio?

DBL and FV have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBL or FV?

FV has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to DBL (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBL dropped -26.45% vs FV's -34.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.