DBJP vs. VJPU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L).
DBJP and VJPU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBJP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 9, 2011. VJPU.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan (USD Hedged). It was launched on Jan 31, 2020. Both DBJP and VJPU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DBJP vs. VJPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBJP vs. VJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 9.63% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | 0.52% |
VJPU.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 9.61% | 31.52% | 23.80% | 35.64% | 1.68% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DBJP having a 9.63% return and VJPU.L slightly lower at 9.61%.
DBJP
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 22.76%
- 1Y
- 45.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 19.11%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
VJPU.L
- 1D
- 4.83%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 9.61%
- 6M
- 22.73%
- 1Y
- 47.06%
- 3Y*
- 30.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBJP vs. VJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBJP has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VJPU.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBJP vs. VJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBJP
VJPU.L
DBJP vs. VJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBJP | VJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 2.18 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 2.88 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 4.95 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.11 | 17.82 | -3.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBJP | VJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.18 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.40 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBJP and VJPU.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DBJP vs. VJPU.L - Dividend Comparison
DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while VJPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.57% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
VJPU.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DBJP vs. VJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than VJPU.L's maximum drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and VJPU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBJP | VJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -25.40% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -11.93% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -4.73% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -2.98% | -4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.66% | +0.50% |
Volatility
DBJP vs. VJPU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is 7.74%, while Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that DBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBJP | VJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 8.44% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 15.04% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.64% | 21.49% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 19.49% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 19.49% | +0.29% |