PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEZ vs. FLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEZ achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's 0.44% return.


DBEZ

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.81%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.46%
1Y
18.85%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.73%

FLGR

1D
-1.91%
1M
3.04%
YTD
0.44%
6M
4.14%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
9.52%26.14%9.51%21.78%-10.13%23.52%0.36%29.94%-10.81%-2.93%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
0.44%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEZ and FLGR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.82

The correlation between DBEZ and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEZ
FLGR

Financial Services

23.1%
21.7%

Industrials

21.9%
30.5%

Technology

14.2%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
8.2%

Utilities

6.6%
5.0%

Healthcare

5.7%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

4.6%
5.9%

Energy

4.4%

-

Communication Services

4.0%
6.3%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.3%

Financial Services

DBEZ
23.1%
FLGR
21.7%

Industrials

DBEZ
21.9%
FLGR
30.5%

Technology

DBEZ
14.2%
FLGR
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEZ
8.7%
FLGR
8.2%

Utilities

DBEZ
6.6%
FLGR
5.0%

Healthcare

DBEZ
5.7%
FLGR
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBEZ
5.3%
FLGR
1.4%

Basic Materials

DBEZ
4.6%
FLGR
5.9%

Energy

DBEZ
4.4%
FLGR

-

Communication Services

DBEZ
4.0%
FLGR
6.3%

Real Estate

DBEZ
1.4%
FLGR
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEZ vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEZ
DBEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DBEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBEZFLGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.05

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.22

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

0.63

+6.04

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEZ and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBEZFLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.19

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.32

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.28

+0.32

Drawdowns

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEZ drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, smaller than the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEZ and FLGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEZFLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-46.21%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-14.44%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-15.53%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.38%

-43.54%

+20.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-4.26%

+3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-12.37%

+6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

5.03%

-2.20%

Volatility

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) is 5.60%, while Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that DBEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEZFLGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

6.23%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

14.03%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

17.18%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

20.26%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

21.43%

-3.07%

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEZ has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEZ vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

DBEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than FLGR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
3.84%4.20%0.62%1.84%1.68%1.64%1.99%2.86%2.56%2.11%3.42%4.92%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.71%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEZ and FLGR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to DBEZ (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEZ dropped -38.76% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

On 5-year performance, DBEZ leads with 11.78% vs 6.45% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DBEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBEZ has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for DBEZ.

DBEZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.71% for FLGR.

DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for DBEZ and 0.09% for FLGR.

DBEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEZ and FLGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer