PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEU vs. EWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEU vs. EWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEU achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than EWN's 18.09% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEU has underperformed EWN with an annualized return of 11.01%, while EWN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.


DBEU

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.69%
YTD
7.52%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.80%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
11.01%

EWN

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.53%
YTD
18.09%
6M
18.14%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEU vs. EWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund
7.52%22.18%9.17%17.43%-6.25%23.99%-1.42%27.32%-8.49%14.60%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
18.09%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%33.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEU and EWN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.78

The correlation between DBEU and EWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEU vs. EWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEU
EWN

Financial Services

23.2%
18.1%

Industrials

19.8%
10.2%

Healthcare

13.0%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
11.5%

Technology

8.5%
34.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
1.5%

Basic Materials

5.6%
3.1%

Energy

5.4%
2.1%

Utilities

5.1%

-

Communication Services

3.7%
14.7%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.7%

Financial Services

DBEU
23.2%
EWN
18.1%

Industrials

DBEU
19.8%
EWN
10.2%

Healthcare

DBEU
13.0%
EWN
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

DBEU
8.7%
EWN
11.5%

Technology

DBEU
8.5%
EWN
34.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEU
6.3%
EWN
1.5%

Basic Materials

DBEU
5.6%
EWN
3.1%

Energy

DBEU
5.4%
EWN
2.1%

Utilities

DBEU
5.1%
EWN

-

Communication Services

DBEU
3.7%
EWN
14.7%

Real Estate

DBEU
0.8%
EWN
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEU vs. EWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEU
DBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEU vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBEUEWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.73

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

2.47

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.57

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.27

9.70

-2.43

DBEU vs. EWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the EWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEU and EWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBEUEWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.73

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.38

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.60

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.31

+0.27

Drawdowns

DBEU vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEU drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, smaller than the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEU and EWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEUEWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-65.22%

+30.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-13.24%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-19.77%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

-43.57%

+25.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

-43.57%

+9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.30%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-16.35%

+11.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

3.49%

-1.04%

Volatility

DBEU vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) is 4.71%, while iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that DBEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEUEWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

7.50%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

16.37%

-5.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

19.68%

-6.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

22.88%

-8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

21.36%

-4.90%

DBEU vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EWN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEU vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison

DBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, which matches EWN's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEU
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund
4.23%4.55%0.07%3.64%1.96%1.87%2.44%2.77%3.55%2.28%9.92%5.50%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.26%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEU and EWN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to DBEU (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEU dropped -34.50% vs EWN's -65.22%.

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 12.79% vs 11.01% for DBEU. On fees, DBEU is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 11.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEU is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWN.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 4.23% for DBEU.

DBEU tracks MSCI Europe US Dollar Hedged Index, while EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBEU and 0.50% for EWN.

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEU and EWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer